|
Author |
Message |
| Common
Ground / Out Back
/ To Janie |
Kim H
Cast Member
Posts: 170
Registered: Aug 2002
|
Posted 02-04-03 10:05 PM
I have said many times that I would discuss the "past problem" with you via email. You delight in making it public over and over again, because you like to play the victim and get the attention. If you want the whole story to be told, I'd be more than happy to tell it now. I am tired of all your crap, and the sad thing is that you will actually not appear as "angelic" as you would like everyone to think. Let me know....I'll check back tomorrow.
[Edited by Kim H]
|
|
Coastalwader
Cast Member
Posts: 935
Registered: Aug 2002
|
Posted 02-04-03 10:18 PM
Well, I've been sitting on my hands long enough on this one.
Kim, what I have never understood about this whole thing is why it is a matter that "has" to be discussed privately.
Kim, when you called Crank out on his past posts on RADP, it wasn't in email. You took up issues with several people here, publicly, on the boards.
Why the double standard?
[Edited by Coastalwader]
King Unca Bubba Lord DisneyTex
|
|
Kim H
Cast Member
Posts: 170
Registered: Aug 2002
|
Posted 02-04-03 10:23 PM
The reason for the double standard is because I was actually trying to be a nicer person. Janie is not as innocent in this story as she would like everyone to believe. If she wants me to tell the whole story I will...I did tell the whole story tosome people here via a PM which obviously was shared with Janie. I would never intentionally try to be nasty to someone. By telling the truth, it would shed a different light on her...at this point, I don't care anymore. I wasn't the bad guy, I am tired of being thought of as the bad guy, and Janie is behaving like a child about it all.
As far as calling out Crank on his comment to me, well I would imagine most people would be upset if they were called such a disgusting name.
|
|
Coastalwader
Cast Member
Posts: 935
Registered: Aug 2002
|
Posted 02-04-03 10:38 PM
quote:
Kim H wrote:
As far as calling out Crank on his comment to me, well I would imagine most people would be upset if they were called such a disgusting name.
Well, a lot of people were upset by a lot of things in this fuc**ed up disaster.
I still see the fact that you wanted to discuss issues that affected you personally in public, but in turn, want to discuss issues that you might have been involved with that affected someone else on a personal level, privately, as a double standard.
Anyway, it's not my fight and I'm back to sitting on my hands on this one.
King Unca Bubba Lord DisneyTex
|
|
Kim H
Cast Member
Posts: 170
Registered: Aug 2002
|
Posted 02-04-03 10:46 PM
I seem to recall that when I was "discussing" things with Crank, it was in the 2nd or 3rd day. I never knew what PM meant, or how to do it, before you switched over to this site.
With regard to Janie, I was in a sense trying to protect her, which I have decided was futile, and has only made me be the bad guy in this whole mess. I am tired of it.
[Edited by Kim H]
|
|
judy
Cast Member
Posts: 413
Registered: Aug 2002
|
Posted 02-04-03 11:00 PM
color me lost.
judy
|
|
Coastalwader
Cast Member
Posts: 935
Registered: Aug 2002
|
Posted 02-04-03 11:01 PM
King Unca Bubba Lord DisneyTex
|
|
Lunarlady
Cast Member
Posts: 1629
Registered: Aug 2002
|
Posted 02-04-03 11:05 PM
quote:
Kim H wrote:
As far as calling out Crank on his comment to me, well I would imagine most people would be upset if they were called such a disgusting name.
I would suggest de-programming yourself so that words will not trigger a prescribed response. Once you give away the fact that you can be controlled by verbal commands, it won't take long for someone to train you to heel and roll-over.
You've indicated disdain for many people here, so why do you care whether or not they have a higher regard for you?
I've been called worse than anything I can imagine Crank saying to anyone else. The choice to become upset by what people say is entirely up to me. I control my behavior, not others. If I were to become upset by what strangers say about me, then I would be turning over the control to them.
The choice to become upset by anything Crank has said to you is entirely up to you. However, if you ENJOY playing the role of the victim then please don't let me stop you. Watching someone have a rightous indignation fit is certainly more interesting right now than the news.
A whole week of peaceful bliss, beginning with a giggle
and ending with a kiss. |
|
phamton
Cast Member
Posts: 366
Registered: Aug 2002
|
Posted 02-05-03 02:03 AM
quote:
judy wrote:
color me lost.
Me, too, Judy. Me too.
I think we can use this for our signature (I saw it on usenet once.)
"Sorry to appear clueless, but quite frankly I am."
Bev
CONTRAINDICATIONS: If you are allergic to any word on this post, do not read.
-----------------------------------------
My Location: 15 minutes from you by car, tops.
|
|
anna
Cast Member
Posts: 36
Registered: Jan 2003
|
Posted 02-05-03 02:38 AM
quote:
phamton wrote:
Me, too, Judy. Me too.
I think we can use this for our signature (I saw it on usenet once.)
"Sorry to appear clueless, but quite frankly I am."
Bev
Ummm, can we go three on that quote? Please. I'm asking nicely.
anna-who's usually surfing from the land of lurk.
|
|
Kim H
Cast Member
Posts: 170
Registered: Aug 2002
|
Posted 02-05-03 06:37 AM
Well, after talking to another poster here, I decided that I am not going to "mix it up" anymore. It isn't worth it, as Janie says "that chapter is closed"
So Janie, I'll "kick you to the curb" too.
See ya.
|
|
Robey
Cast Member
Posts: 1023
Registered: Aug 2002
|
Posted 02-05-03 07:44 AM
Ok let me be "Captain Obvious" for second...
Summary...
Janie's emails were made public.
KimH faciliatated this somehow.
(The emails from Janie were addressed to KimH)
Janie found out and asked how and why.
KimH refused to answer her.
Months later......
Janie finds out the truth.
Janie publicly posts that she knows now.
KimH wants to resolve this via email not publicly.
Ok here's the Captain Obvious...
Why in the world would Janie even THINK of going through email if in fact THAT is where the problem began? (duh)
Besides, the forum IS public. You made it so.
You faciliatated it becoming public by allowing Janie's private email to be read by others and then posted in a public forum. That is where Janie was hung out to dry using "private" communication. (Which I find abhorent) Therefore your reply should be the same. She asked you MANY times to do just that. And if you had nothing to hide, you would have answered her long ago.
Janie would be a fool to give you her email address now.
She has already seen what becomes of that.
The bottom line..
The "story" as you call, it is not important, nor is it even the issue. Janie's private communication was put in the hands of people that invaded Janie's privacy by publicly posting it. And you, somehow, faciliatated that.
It was wrong, janie deserves an apology.
If you don't think so, fine. Move on.
But I personally think it is outrageous, and I can't imagine anyone that would say think it was ok, under ANY circumstances.......ANY circumstances.
I always wondered why somebody didn't do something about that. Then I realized I was somebody. --Lily Tomlin
|
|
Francine
Super Moderator
Posts: 1309
Registered: Aug 2002
|
Posted 02-05-03 09:26 AM
quote:
Robey wrote:
Ok let me be "Captain Obvious" for second...
Summary...
Janie's emails were made public.
KimH faciliatated this somehow.
(The emails from Janie were addressed to KimH)
Janie found out and asked how and why.
KimH refused to answer her.
Months later......
Janie finds out the truth.
Janie publicly posts that she knows now.
KimH wants to resolve this via email not publicly.
Ok here's the Captain Obvious...
Why in the world would Janie even THINK of going through email if in fact THAT is where the problem began? (duh)
Besides, the forum IS public. You made it so.
You faciliatated it becoming public by allowing Janie's private email to be read by others and then posted in a public forum. That is where Janie was hung out to dry using "private" communication. (Which I find abhorent) Therefore your reply should be the same. She asked you MANY times to do just that. And if you had nothing to hide, you would have answered her long ago.
Janie would be a fool to give you her email address now.
She has already seen what becomes of that.
The bottom line..
The "story" as you call, it is not important, nor is it even the issue. Janie's private communication was put in the hands of people that invaded Janie's privacy by publicly posting it. And you, somehow, faciliatated that.
It was wrong, janie deserves an apology.
If you don't think so, fine. Move on.
But I personally think it is outrageous, and I can't imagine anyone that would say think it was ok, under ANY circumstances.......ANY circumstances.
Two words, no excuse me, three words. What she said.
Francine
Come and visit my other home on the internet Our Laughing Place
|
|
TrpltJanie
Cast Member
Posts: 1661
Registered: Aug 2002
|
Posted 02-05-03 12:58 PM
KimH wrote:
With regard to Janie, I was in a sense trying to protect her,*SNORT* which I have decided was futile,*Double SNORT* and has only made me be the bad guy in this whole mess. *snort-laughing hysterically* I am tired of it.
(whips out my whoopee cushion)
PHHHHHFFFFFFFTTTTTTTT!
[Edited by TrpltJanie]
Janie
The Curb Kicker
|
|
|
Common
Ground / Out Back
/ To Janie |
|
